Prediction of Petra Granic vs Natalija Sipek Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Granic vs N. Sipek

Petra Granic

CRO

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

586

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Natalija Sipek

SLO

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

586

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Granic 1 - 0 Sipek

They have played 2 sets in total, with Petra Granic winning 2 and Natalija Sipek winning 0. The last match between Petra Granic and Natalija Sipek was at the Bol, 25-11-2013, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Petra Granic getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Granic	1
Sipek	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Bol(11-25-13)

Stats

Petra Granic

Natalija Sipek

P. Granic vs N. Sipek H2H Profile

P. Granic	Stats	N. Sipek
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
46.88% (15-17)	Career Total W/L	53.60% (67-58)
1	Clay	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Granic vs N. Sipek Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Petra Granic has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Natalija Sipek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Petra Granic, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Natalija Sipek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Petra Granic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Natalija Sipek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Petra Granic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Natalija Sipek winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Petra Granic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 13/15). Natalija Sipek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 44/34), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/2).
Player level: In the last year, Petra Granic has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Natalija Sipek has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Petra Granic winning 1 times and Natalija Sipek being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Petra Granic winning 2 and Natalija Sipek winning 0.
The last match between Petra Granic and Natalija Sipek was at the Bol, 25-11-2013, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Petra Granic getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Petra Granic has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Natalija Sipek has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Petra Granic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Natalija Sipek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Petra Granic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Natalija Sipek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Petra Granic vs Natalija Sipek Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Granic vs N. Sipek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Granic	Stats	N. Sipek
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Granic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W15 Sibenik - 24-05-2021
Q1 Adela MoravcovaA. Moravcova	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
W25 Zagreb - 14-09-2020
Q1 Andreea RoscaA. Rosca	L	4-6 6-2 10-3	Stats
Bol - 21-09-2015
Q1 Ana BiskicA. Biskic	L	6-7(3) 6-3 7-5	Stats
Bol - 01-06-2015
Q3 Eliska PetrackovaE. Petrackova	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
Q1 Natasha PiluduN. Piludu	W	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Sipek Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Maribor - 13-06-2016
R1 Kaja JuvanK. Juvan	L	7-6(4) 6-4	Stats
Q3 Christina WolfgruberC. Wolfgruber	W	4-6 6-2 7-6(9)	Stats
Q2 Arabella KollerA. Koller	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
Heraklion - 18-04-2016
R1 Alexandra PerperA. Perper	L	7-6(6) 7-6(5)	Stats
Heraklion - 11-04-2016
R2 Irene BurilloI. Burillo	L	6-3 4-6 6-3	Stats

View All

P. Granic vs N. Sipek Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Granic	Stats	N. Sipek
46.88% (15/17)	YTD Win/Loss	53.60% (67/58)
50.75% (34/33)	Sets Win/Loss	52.38% (143/130)
48.24% (287/308)	Games Win/Loss	51.81% (1246/1159)
50.00% (2/2)	Hard Win/Loss	50.00% (22/22)
46.43% (13/15)	Clay Win/Loss	56.41% (44/34)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	33.33% (1/2)
0	Aces Per Game	0.02
0	Aces Total	23
0	Double Faults Per Game	0.08
0	Total Double Faults	94
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
438.28	Average Opponent Rank	547.91
0% (0/0)	1st Serve %	59% (660/1116)
0% (0/0)	1st Serve Win %	61% (403/660)
0% (0/0)	2nd Serve Win %	41% (189/456)
0% (0/0)	Break Points Won % (Total)	42% (55/132)
0% (0/0)	Return Points Win %	44% (491/1126)
0.00% (0/1)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (5/5)
48.39% (15/16)	Futures W/L	53.91% (62/53)
50% (15/30)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	53% (64/121)
100% (5/5)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	44% (12/27)
40% (2/5)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (15/27)
82% (17/14)	1st Set Won, Won Match	95% (62/59)
12% (17/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	5% (62/3)
13% (15/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (63/8)